<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://roldham.wordpress.com/2006/10/14/13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roldham.wordpress.com/2006/10/14/13/</link>
	<description>A Blog for LIS757</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mmaceach</title>
		<link>http://roldham.wordpress.com/2006/10/14/13/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>mmaceach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roldham.wordpress.com/2006/10/14/13/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>If the content is that sensitive then it shouldn&#039;t be published on a wiki.  If you are using a wiki, then you should probably, as you say, take vandalism into consideration.   But, if vandalism occurs, you shouldn&#039;t chastise the community.  A wiki is open to editing, whether &#039;good&#039; or &#039;bad&#039;, and I dont&#039; really see a problem with that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the content is that sensitive then it shouldn&#8217;t be published on a wiki.  If you are using a wiki, then you should probably, as you say, take vandalism into consideration.   But, if vandalism occurs, you shouldn&#8217;t chastise the community.  A wiki is open to editing, whether &#8216;good&#8217; or &#8216;bad&#8217;, and I dont&#8217; really see a problem with that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://roldham.wordpress.com/2006/10/14/13/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roldham.wordpress.com/2006/10/14/13/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>i am not saying that the editing community cannot be trusted at all... i am just saying that the potential threat that your content could be &#039;vandalized&#039; is VERY real, and that this should be taken into consideration when utilizing this web 2.0 technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am not saying that the editing community cannot be trusted at all&#8230; i am just saying that the potential threat that your content could be &#8216;vandalized&#8217; is VERY real, and that this should be taken into consideration when utilizing this web 2.0 technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://roldham.wordpress.com/2006/10/14/13/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 04:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roldham.wordpress.com/2006/10/14/13/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, put some trust in the editing community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, put some trust in the editing community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
